Acceptability of financial incentives for breastfeeding: thematic analysis
of comments to UK online news reports
Authors
J. Adams
M. Holmes
E. McColl
F. Sniehotta
E. Giles
Abstract
Background The World Health Organization recommends babies are
breastfed for at least six months. Financial incentives have been used to encourage
breastfeeding, but limited research has explored their acceptability. We examined UK public
attitudes towards financial incentives for breastfeeding using online data. Methods Thematic
analysis was undertaken on 3,373 reader comments posted in response to 13 articles reporting a
pilot study exploring the effectiveness of incentives for breastfeeding. All articles were
published in November 2013 on one of six popular UK news websites. Findings Nine themes were
identified: children are a lifestyle choice; financial incentives are discriminatory and
divisive; incentives create a culture of entitlement; incentives are personally insulting; they
have an emotional impact on recipients; they need to be effective and cost-effective; they need
to generate initial motivation; the design, delivery and impact of incentives are questioned;
and they have an inequitable impact on personal choice. Discussion Those commenting on the
online UK news articles amongst the general public viewed financial incentives for
breastfeeding as unacceptable and that alternative, structural, interventions were likely to be
more effective.