Effective behaviour change techniques in health behaviour change
interventions: a review of meta-analyses
Authors
K. Sainsbury
E. Kothe
B. Mullan
M. Hagger
K. Hamilton
Abstract
Background: Coding of intervention descriptions for inclusion of
specific behaviour change techniques (BCTs) is becoming an increasingly popular means for
identifying ‘active ingredients’ of interventions and to inform the design of optimally
effective interventions. Methods: An electronic search identified 16 meta-analyses that met the
inclusion criteria. Data were extracted from moderator analyses to determine differences in
average effect sizes associated with the presence versus absence of each distinct BCT.
Findings: The BCTs most commonly reported on were ‘prompt specific goal setting’ (data
extracted from 15 meta-analyses; k), ‘prompt barrier identification’ (k=14), ‘prompt
self-monitoring of behaviour’ (k=14), ‘provide information on consequences’ (k=13), ‘provide
feedback on performance’ (k=13), ‘use of follow-up prompts’ (k=13), ‘plan social support or
social change’ (k=13), ‘provide instruction’ (k=12), and ‘prompt review of behavioural goals’
(k=12). Of these, the inclusion of all but one BCT (follow-up prompts) appeared to be
associated with larger effect sizes than non-inclusion. Discussion: The results suggest that
the inclusion of particular BCTs are likely to increase the effectiveness of interventions, and
contribute to the emerging science of behaviour change.