Effects of self-affirming messages on smokers’ responses to health warnings
AbstractBackground: The aim of this study is to explore a new method of using self-affirmation theory to reduce defensive responses to health warning messages. Although self-affirmation suggests promising effects, the applicability for health campaigns is limited. In this new approach, participant’s self-concepts were affirmed via textual information integrated on cigarette packs. Below the health warning an affirming message was presented on cigarette packs. Methods: One hundred sixty four smokers were exposed to 5 cigarette packs showing health warnings (e.g.: “Smoking kills you”) in combination with either an affirming message or a non-affirming message to assess defensive responses on health warnings evaluations and self-efficacy measures. The moderating effect of nicotine dependency was also examined. Findings: Participants exposed to health warnings with an affirming message (affirmed participants) judged the warnings as more threatening than participants exposed to health warnings without an affirming message (non-affirmed participants). For participants with high nicotine dependence, an affirmation message resulted in a more positive evaluation of the health warnings and greater self-efficacy to stop smoking than a non-affirmation text. For participants with low nicotine dependence, there were no differences in health warning evaluation and self-efficacy levels between the affirmed and non-affirmed message conditions. Discussion: These results suggest promising effects of affirming messages incorporated in health warnings to reduce defensive responses.
Copyright (c) 2017 L. Kessels, K. Massar, J. de Vreede
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.