Understanding the stakeholders’ intention to use model-based economic
evaluations: an EQUIPT study
Authors
K.L. Cheung
S. Evers
M. Hiligsmann
Z. Vokó
S. Pokhrel
T. Jones
C. Muñoz
S.B. Wolfenstetter
J. Józwiak-Hagymásy
H. de Vries
Abstract
Background: Despite an increased number of economic evaluations of
tobacco control interventions, the uptake by stakeholders continues to be limited. By applying
the I-Change Model, this study aims to identify which factors determine potential uptake of
(model-based) economic evaluations. Methods: Stakeholders (decision makers, purchasers of
services/pharma products, professionals/service providers, evidence generators and advocates of
health promotion) were interviewed in five countries, using an I-Change based questionnaire.
MANOVA’s were conducted to assess differences between intenders and non-intenders regarding
beliefs. Multiple regression analyses were conducted to identify the main predictors of
intention to use a model-based tool. Findings: Ninety-three stakeholders participated.
Significant differences in beliefs were found between non-intenders and intenders: risk
perception, and motivational factors towards using the tool. In addition, country, attitude,
and social support were significant predictors of intention. Discussion: This study is the
first to provide a theoretical framework to understand differences in beliefs between
stakeholders who do or do not intend to use (model-based) economic evaluations, and empirically
corroborating the framework. This contributes to our understanding of the facilitators and
barriers to the uptake of these studies.