Theory and evidence for an intervention to improve clinicians’ diabetes
care: the IDEA trial
Authors
M. Johnston
J. Mackintosh
J. Francis
F. Sniehotta
I.N. Steen
J. Grimshaw
E. Kaner
M. Elovainio
G. Hawthorne
J. Presseau
Abstract
Background: Evidence suggests that care delivered to patients with
diabetes might be improved by intervention to change the behaviour of physicians and nurses.
Prior to trialling a dual process theory- and evidence-based intervention, this study aimed to
identify whether clinician behaviours and theoretical predictors show room for improvement.
Methods: Questionnaires were sent to clinicians in 44 primary care practices, addressing
performance of six separate clinician behaviours involving prescribing, advising and examining
for diabetes management, and cognitions about these behaviours Findings: Questionnaires were
completed by 219 clinicians (67% response rate). For all six behaviours, clinicians reported
performance was less than 100% of patients (range 54.9% for prescribing to 82.3% for foot
examination). All except foot examination had mean scores < 5 (7-point scale) for
self-efficacy, coping-planning or automaticity. Discussion: There was room for improvement in
all behaviours and all cognitions theorised to determine the behaviours (especially
self-efficacy, coping-planning and automaticity). Therefore an intervention designed to change
these behaviours by targeting the investigated predictors has the potential to be effective and
is currently being evaluated.