Illness representations, coping, and illness outcomes in people with
cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
E. Richardson
N. Schüz
K. Sanderson
J. Scott
B. Schüz
Abstract
Background: Cancer is a leading cause of illness burden, with people
with cancer at high risk for negative health and coping outcomes. The Common Sense Model (CSM)
has been employed widely to understand individual responses to cancer. However, research is
disparate, and a systematic review examining the associations of the CSM’s illness
representation dimensions with health and coping outcomes in people with cancer, had not yet
been conducted. Methods: A systematic literature search identified 51 relevant studies, with 36
providing sufficient data for meta-analysis. A narrative review of remaining studies was
conducted. Findings: Random-effects meta-analysis revealed, for example, small to moderate
effects (Fischer’s Z = .267 - .287) between personal control, problem-focused coping, and
cognitive reappraisal, and moderate to large effects (Z = .355 - .731) between identity,
consequences, emotional representations, and distress. Discussion: This first systematic review
and meta-analysis indicates how illness representations relate to illness outcomes in people
with cancer. High heterogeneity suggests potential moderators of the relationships between
illness representations and health and coping outcomes, including diagnostic, prognostic, and
treatment related variables.